# POL-074 — An explicit SMS opt-in carve-out belongs in the policy either way

> The policy must carry an explicit sentence excluding SMS opt-in data and consent from any sharing, whether or not it discloses sharing elsewhere.

- **Rule ID:** POL-074
- **Layer:** Policy pages (`POLICY_PAGE`)
- **Checks:** `privacy policy carve-out sentence`
- **Severity:** BLOCKING — Breaking this rule gets the submission rejected outright.
- **When it bites:** Gates approval — get this wrong and registration is refused
- **How it is detected:** AI judgement over the submitted form
- **Fix type:** Fix the privacy policy or SMS terms
- **Required by:** Infobip, Bird, Telnyx, Aerialink, AWS
- **Applies:** Applies to every 10DLC registration.
- **Canonical URL:** https://ekas.io/rules/10dlc/policy-page/pol-074/

## Why this rule exists

Reviewers grep for this sentence, so a policy that is silent about sharing gets no credit for its silence — the absence of a bad clause is not the presence of the promise. Telnyx publishes the exact wording, which is a strong hint that what is being checked is the formulation rather than the sentiment, and paraphrases that soften it routinely fail.

## How to fix it

Paste the published carve-out sentence immediately after whatever the policy says about sharing — or, in a policy that discloses none, at the end of the data-collection section. Done when the words "text messaging originator opt-in data and consent" appear in the document.

## Example of a compliant value

```text
All the above categories exclude text messaging originator opt-in data and consent; this information will not be shared with any third parties.
```

## Common mistakes

- Placing the sentence in a section of its own, far from the sharing disclosure, weakens it: the point is that it visibly overrides the categories immediately above it.

## Provider rejection codes

| Provider | Code | Resubmission allowed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bandwidth/DCA | `852` | yes |

## Notes

Absorbs POL-075, which states the same requirement for a policy that discloses no sharing at all. The sentence to add is identical in both cases, which is why they are one obligation.
