A consent surface a reviewer cannot reach must be declared as such
The requirementstatement
Where the opt-in sits behind a login, is unpublished, is spoken, or is on paper, the submission must say so explicitly.
- Severityseverity
- HighHIGHRejected by at least one carrier or provider, and a common cause of failure at the rest.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- campaign.message_flow
- Where it liveslayer
- CampaignCAMPAIGN
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- AWSTwilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Add one sentence naming why the surface is not reachable and what stands in for it. Done when the flow text answers the question a reviewer would otherwise have to ask.
A compliant exampleexample
The opt-in toggle sits inside the authenticated account portal and cannot be crawled, so a screenshot taken from a live account is attached: https://cdn.acmecoffee.com/compliance/portal-optin.png
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twilio | 30909 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
6 other rules read campaign.message_flow. Fixing one field to satisfy a single rule is how a resubmission trades one rejection for another, so read these before you change anything.
CMP-127 is one of 94 campaign rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.