Evidence must travel by the route the submission target actually offers

The requirementstatement

Evidence must reach the reviewer through the channel the submission target provides, whether an upload field, a TCR attachment, or a URL inside the flow.

Severityseverity
HighHIGHRejected by at least one carrier or provider, and a common cause of failure at the rest.
When it bitesphase
Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
What is checkedobject
evidence channel + campaign.message_flow
Where it liveslayer
CampaignCAMPAIGN
How Ekas settles itdetectability
DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
What the fix involvesfailureClass
Supply evidenceTERMINAL_EVIDENCE
Needs proof only you hold: a screenshot, a recording, a scan of the form people signed.
Who requires itauthorities
BandwidthTelnyxBird
When it appliesapplicabilityText
Applies to every 10DLC registration.

Why this rule existsrationale

Every platform exposes exactly one evidence channel and none of them is the same: one has a multimedia upload field, one attaches the form to TCR, one accepts files only in its console and needs a URL in the payload when you use the API. Evidence lodged in the wrong place is not late or malformed — it is invisible, and the rejection reads as though nothing was ever attached.

How to fix itremediation

Use your target's channel: Bandwidth's "CTA, Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions Multimedia Upload" field; a TCR attachment on the express-consent form for Telnyx; Bird's console attachments, or the proof URL inside the messageFlow JSON when you submit by API because attachments there are UI-only. Done when the evidence is reachable from the submission itself rather than from your own console.

A compliant exampleexample

Submitting to Bird by API: messageFlow ends with "Opt-in proof: https://cdn.acmecoffee.com/compliance/optin.png" because attachments cannot be sent over the API.

Common mistakespitfalls

  • Attaching in the console and submitting by API is the combination that silently loses the evidence: the file is visible to you and absent from the payload the reviewer receives.

Notesnotes

Three catalog rows, one obligation with the destination as its parameter — Bandwidth's upload field (CMP-131), Telnyx's TCR attachment (CMP-133) and Bird's API workaround (CMP-134). Written as one rule because a submitter has exactly one target and needs exactly one instruction; three rules would report the same gap three times with two of them irrelevant. We can see that evidence exists and whether the flow text carries a URL, but not which UI field a file was uploaded through, so the check settles the observable half and the remediation carries the rest.

Rules you will hit next

Other campaign rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.

All campaign rules

CMP-131 is one of 94 campaign rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.

Reading the rules is the easy part.

Ekas runs every rule that gates approval, 823 of these 915, against your registration before it reaches the carrier. It reads your site, your policy pages and your opt-in the way a reviewer would, and hands you the fix, not just the verdict.