A tax-exempt organisation must not order a political vet
The requirementstatement
A political vet must not be requested or imported for a brand that already holds 501(c)(3), (4), (5) or (6) status.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- brand.tax_exempt_status + the political vet order
- Where it liveslayer
- BrandBRAND
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
- Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- TCR
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies when the brand is a non-profit.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Rely on the tax-exempt status you already hold and do not order or import a political vet. Make sure the status is recorded as an attribute on the brand rather than only claimed on the form — BRD-263 is the appeal route if the registry did not set it.
A compliant exampleexample
tax_exempt_status: 501(c)(4) with no political vet ordered — the status is the qualifying artefact
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| TCR | 541 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
Other brand rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
BRD-242 is one of 196 brand rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.