Consent collected on a third-party platform must still name the registered brand
The requirementstatement
Consent evidence captured on a third-party platform must show the registered brand as the party the consumer agreed to hear from.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- opt-in evidence captured on a third-party surface
- Where it liveslayer
- CampaignCAMPAIGN
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · visionVISION
- Needs the pixels: a screenshot of the opt-in surface, a scanned paper form, an MMS attachment.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Supply evidenceTERMINAL_EVIDENCE
- Needs proof only you hold: a screenshot, a recording, a scan of the form people signed.
- Who requires itauthorities
- Twilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies when consent was collected by third party, social and chat.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Configure the third-party surface to name your business in the consent text — most let you set the merchant or sender name — and re-capture the screenshot afterwards. Done when the registered brand name is visible in the same frame as the consent control.
Common mistakespitfalls
- The platform's own branding in the header does not substitute for naming your business in the consent sentence, and a reviewer reads the sentence rather than the chrome.
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twilio | 30927 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
Other campaign rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
CMP-119 is one of 94 campaign rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.