Evidence must come from one company, not several
The requirementstatement
A campaign's opt-in evidence must all come from the registered brand, not from subsidiaries, franchises or client brands.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- opt-in evidence across the bundle
- Where it liveslayer
- CampaignCAMPAIGN
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Supply evidenceTERMINAL_EVIDENCE
- Needs proof only you hold: a screenshot, a recording, a scan of the form people signed.
- Who requires itauthorities
- Twilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Attach only artifacts captured from this brand's own consent surfaces, and register a separate campaign for each other entity. Where the programme genuinely spans franchisees, the AGENTS_FRANCHISES use case is the route that lets sub-entities be disclosed rather than hidden.
A compliant exampleexample
Every screenshot shows acmecoffee.com — not one from acmecoffee.com and one from a sister brand that happens to run the same form.
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twilio | 30926 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
Other campaign rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
CMP-129 is one of 94 campaign rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.