An alternative to SMS must exist where the service needs to reach the consumer
The requirementstatement
A programme must not make receiving text messages the only way to sign up or to be served, with no other channel offered.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- signup flow alternatives
- Where it liveslayer
- Consent flowCONSENT_FLOW
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · crawlCRAWL
- Needs your live site or policy page fetched and read. Ekas crawls it the way a reviewer would.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the websiteTERMINAL_WEBSITE
- The fix lives on your site. No amount of rewording the form clears it.
- Who requires itauthorities
- AWSFCCTwilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies when the use case is NOT TWO_FACTOR_AUTH, SECURITY_ALERT and FRAUD_ALERT.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Offer at least one non-SMS route to the same outcome — email the confirmation, show it on screen, or let the customer pick a channel — and say so where the number is collected. Done when a customer who never gives a mobile number can still complete the signup and receive whatever the text would have carried.
Common mistakespitfalls
- Offering an alternative that is worse on purpose ("email delivery may take up to 5 days") is the same coercion with a fig leaf, and reads that way to a reviewer.
- A 2FA or fraud-alert programme genuinely has no alternative channel — those use cases are excluded from this rule rather than argued out of it.
Rules you will hit next
Other consent flow rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
CON-072 is one of 101 consent flow rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.