Emergency and public-safety use cases exclude sole proprietors
The requirementstatement
Public-safety and emergency use cases are not available to a SOLE_PROPRIETOR brand.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- brand.entity_type + campaign.usecase
- Where it liveslayer
- Brand ↔ campaignCROSS
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
- Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- TCR
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies when the brand is a sole proprietor.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Register the organisation as a standard entity with its EIN. If the messaging is genuinely operational rather than emergency, choose CUSTOMER_CARE or ACCOUNT_NOTIFICATION instead.
A compliant exampleexample
Entity type: PRIVATE_PROFIT or GOVERNMENT · Use case: EMERGENCY
Rules you will hit next
2 other rules read brand.entity_type + campaign.usecase. Fixing one field to satisfy a single rule is how a resubmission trades one rejection for another, so read these before you change anything.
XBC-004 is one of 13 brand ↔ campaign rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.