A forwarded or referred message must say why the recipient received it
The requirementstatement
A message sent because another consumer referred or forwarded it must identify the person who sent it and state why the recipient is receiving it.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- viral message body
- Where it liveslayer
- Message contentMESSAGE_CONTENT
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- CTIA
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Put the referring person's name and the reason into the first sentence of the referral template, before the offer — a [referrer name] token and a clause saying they sent it. Done when a recipient who has never heard of your business can tell, from the first line, who thought of them and why.
A compliant exampleexample
Acme Coffee: [referrer first name] sent you a free bag of our Ethiopia Guji because they thought you would like it. Claim it at https://acmecoffee.com/r/4471 Reply STOP to opt out.
Common mistakespitfalls
- Naming only the business does not satisfy this — the required identification is of the consumer who sent it, and that is the part referral tooling most often cannot supply.
Notesnotes
Rules you will hit next
Other message content rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
MSG-266 is one of 122 message content rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.