The non-sharing prohibition must hold even with consumer consent
The requirementstatement
The prohibition must be unconditional — an "unless you consent" or "except where you have authorised" escape clause fails.
- Severityseverity
- HighHIGHRejected by at least one carrier or provider, and a common cause of failure at the rest.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- privacy policy body
- Where it liveslayer
- Policy pagesPOLICY_PAGE
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the policyTERMINAL_POLICY
- The fix lives in your privacy policy or SMS terms. Ekas can generate the missing clauses.
- Who requires itauthorities
- TCRT-Mobile
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Delete any conditional qualifier from the non-sharing sentence so it reads as an unconditional commitment.
A compliant exampleexample
No mobile information will be shared with third parties or affiliates for marketing or promotional purposes.
Rules you will hit next
6 other rules read privacy policy body. Fixing one field to satisfy a single rule is how a resubmission trades one rejection for another, so read these before you change anything.
POL-061 is one of 157 policy pages rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.