A political brand is held to the same data-sharing ban
The requirementstatement
The third-party data-sharing prohibition applies to a political brand's policy exactly as it does to a commercial one.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- privacy policy body
- Where it liveslayer
- Policy pagesPOLICY_PAGE
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · crawlCRAWL
- Needs your live site or policy page fetched and read. Ekas crawls it the way a reviewer would.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the policyTERMINAL_POLICY
- The fix lives in your privacy policy or SMS terms. Ekas can generate the missing clauses.
- Who requires itauthorities
- Twilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies when the use case is POLITICAL.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Exclude mobile numbers and messaging consent from every list-exchange, coalition or vendor-sharing clause in the policy, and stop the practice for the numbers in this programme. Done when the policy says supporter mobile data is not shared with allied organisations.
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twiliogen2 | 30951 | No |
Notesnotes
Rules you will hit next
6 other rules read privacy policy body. Fixing one field to satisfy a single rule is how a resubmission trades one rejection for another, so read these before you change anything.
POL-078 is one of 157 policy pages rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.