The policy needs a children's-data section
The requirementstatement
The privacy policy must carry a children's-data section with a parental-consent route and a deletion route.
- Severityseverity
- HighHIGHRejected by at least one carrier or provider, and a common cause of failure at the rest.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- privacy policy body
- Where it liveslayer
- Policy pagesPOLICY_PAGE
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the policyTERMINAL_POLICY
- The fix lives in your privacy policy or SMS terms. Ekas can generate the missing clauses.
- Who requires itauthorities
- FTCCTIA
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Add a children's section giving the age position, the parental route and the deletion commitment. Done when a parent reading it knows exactly who to contact and what will happen.
A compliant exampleexample
The Acme Coffee text programme is not directed at children under 13 and we do not knowingly collect their information. A parent can email privacy@acmecoffee.com to see what we hold about a child and we will delete it.
Notesnotes
Rules you will hit next
6 other rules read privacy policy body. Fixing one field to satisfy a single rule is how a resubmission trades one rejection for another, so read these before you change anything.
POL-113 is one of 157 policy pages rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.