Keep the appeal explanation inside its limit
The requirementstatement
The appeal explanation must be no longer than 1,024 characters.
- Severityseverity
- MediumMEDIUMUsually survives review, but lowers your trust score or invites a manual look you would rather avoid.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- appeal.explanation
- Where it liveslayer
- BrandBRAND
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
- Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- TCR
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Write the explanation as three sentences: what was decided, what is wrong with it, and what the attached document proves. Put the detail in the attachments, which is where a reviewer looks anyway. Done when the field is under 1,024 characters.
A compliant exampleexample
explanation: "The brand was refused as unverified. The legal name on the registration matches the attached CP-575 exactly, including the comma before LLC. The address matches the same letter. Please re-run verification against the attached document."
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| TCR | 501 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
Other brand rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
BRD-257 is one of 196 brand rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.