An incentivised opt-in needs a financial-incentive notice that agrees with the SMS clause
The requirementstatement
Where joining the programme earns a discount or other reward, the policy must carry a CCPA Notice of Financial Incentive that does not contradict the messaging clause.
- Severityseverity
- MediumMEDIUMUsually survives review, but lowers your trust score or invites a manual look you would rather avoid.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- privacy policy body + opt-in offer text
- Where it liveslayer
- Policy pagesPOLICY_PAGE
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · crawlCRAWL
- Needs your live site or policy page fetched and read. Ekas crawls it the way a reviewer would.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the policyTERMINAL_POLICY
- The fix lives in your privacy policy or SMS terms. Ekas can generate the missing clauses.
- Who requires itauthorities
- CCPA
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Add the notice — what the incentive is, what data it relates to, how to withdraw, and a good-faith estimate of value — and state that messaging opt-in data is still never shared. Done when the two sections agree.
Common mistakespitfalls
- The value estimate is the sentence that can contradict the non-sharing clause. Base it on the value of the customer relationship rather than on what the data would fetch if sold.
Notesnotes
Rules you will hit next
Other policy pages rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
POL-111 is one of 157 policy pages rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.