The DBA must be consistent with the legal name and every other field
The requirementstatement
The DBA must be recognisably the same business as the legal name, the website, and the campaign — not an unrelated third name.
- Severityseverity
- HighHIGHRejected by at least one carrier or provider, and a common cause of failure at the rest.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- brand.dba vs brand.company_name
- Where it liveslayer
- BrandBRAND
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- AWSBandwidthHighLevel
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Set the DBA to the name customers actually see from this brand — the one on the website header and in the message sender line. If the business genuinely trades under several names, register a separate brand per name rather than listing one and messaging under another. Done when the DBA, the website title and the name in the samples are the same business.
A compliant exampleexample
company_name: Acme Coffee Co, LLC · dba: Acme Coffee · website: acmecoffee.com — one business, three consistent renderings
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twilio | 30918 | Yes |
Notesnotes
Rules you will hit next
Other brand rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
BRD-146 is one of 196 brand rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.