The opt-in evidence must be on the brand's own domain
The requirementstatement
The website domain shown in the opt-in evidence must match the brand's registered domain.
- Severityseverity
- HighHIGHRejected by at least one carrier or provider, and a common cause of failure at the rest.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- evidence domain vs brand.website
- Where it liveslayer
- BrandBRAND
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
- Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- Twilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Attach evidence captured on the brand's own site. If the opt-in genuinely happens on another company's domain, that company is the brand — register them instead. Done when the domain visible in the evidence and the registered website are the same business.
A compliant exampleexample
evidence: https://cdn.acmecoffee.com/compliance/checkout-optin.png · website: https://acmecoffee.com — the same registrable domain
Common mistakespitfalls
- A CDN or asset subdomain of the brand's own domain is fine; a hosting service on somebody else's domain is not, because the reviewer cannot tell whose page it was.
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twilio | 30927 | Yes |
Notesnotes
Rules you will hit next
Other brand rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
BRD-149 is one of 196 brand rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.