Identity-plus vetting is for public companies only
The requirementstatement
An Authentication+ vet must not be ordered for a brand that is not PUBLIC_PROFIT.
- Severityseverity
- BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- the vet order + brand.entity_type
- Where it liveslayer
- BrandBRAND
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
- Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
- A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
- Who requires itauthorities
- TCR
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies when the brand is NOT a public company.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Order a standard vet instead — it is the one that raises throughput for a private, non-profit or government brand. Authentication+ is not a higher tier of the same thing; it is a different verification for a different entity type.
A compliant exampleexample
vetting class: STANDARD for a PRIVATE_PROFIT brand — not AUTHPLUS
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| TCR | 592 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
Other brand rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
BRD-230 is one of 196 brand rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.