Opt-in description must carry the registered brand name

The requirementstatement

The CTA / message-flow field must name the brand, matching the registered Brand or DBA.

Severityseverity
BlockingBLOCKINGBreaking this rule gets the submission rejected. There is no partial credit.
When it bitesphase
Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
What is checkedobject
brand.display_name + campaign.message_flow
Where it liveslayer
Brand ↔ campaignCROSS
How Ekas settles itdetectability
DeterministicDETERMINISTIC
Settled in code from the values you submitted. No model involved, no judgement call, same answer every time.
What the fix involvesfailureClass
Fix the fieldRETRY_FIELD
A better value in the form fixes it. Ekas can rewrite it and re-check.
Who requires itauthorities
BandwidthTelnyxAWS
When it appliesapplicabilityText
Applies to every 10DLC registration.

Why this rule existsrationale

The reviewer reads the message flow to confirm the consent a consumer gave was consent to hear from THIS brand. A flow describing an anonymous opt-in cannot establish that, and it is also the exact pattern a reseller registering someone else’s traffic would produce.

How to fix itremediation

Name the brand explicitly in the opt-in description, and quote the consent wording the consumer agrees to — that wording should name the brand too.

A compliant exampleexample

Customers opt in at acmecoffee.com/signup by ticking an unchecked box agreeing to receive recurring automated marketing texts from Acme Coffee.

Rules you will hit next

Other brand ↔ campaign rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.

All brand ↔ campaign rules

XBC-011 is one of 13 brand ↔ campaign rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.

Reading the rules is the easy part.

Ekas runs every rule that gates approval, 823 of these 915, against your registration before it reaches the carrier. It reads your site, your policy pages and your opt-in the way a reviewer would, and hands you the fix, not just the verdict.