The services in the terms must match the campaign description
The requirementstatement
The services or products described in the terms must be consistent with what the campaign description says the business does.
- Severityseverity
- MediumMEDIUMUsually survives review, but lowers your trust score or invites a manual look you would rather avoid.
- When it bitesphase
- Gates approvalapprovalGet this wrong and the brand or campaign is refused at registration.
- What is checkedobject
- ToS services section vs campaign.description
- Where it liveslayer
- Policy pagesPOLICY_PAGE
- How Ekas settles itdetectability
- AI · formAI_FORM
- A semantic question about what you wrote: whether a description matches a use case, whether a name looks like a filed entity. Judged by a model against written criteria.
- What the fix involvesfailureClass
- Fix the policyTERMINAL_POLICY
- The fix lives in your privacy policy or SMS terms. Ekas can generate the missing clauses.
- Who requires itauthorities
- Twilio
- When it appliesapplicabilityText
- Applies to every 10DLC registration.
Why this rule existsrationale
How to fix itremediation
Bring the services section into line with what the business actually sells, and check it against the campaign description before submitting. Done when both describe the same business.
A compliant exampleexample
Terms: "Acme Coffee sells roasted coffee, subscriptions and brewing equipment." Campaign description names the same business.
Provider rejection codescodes
The code you get back when this rule is what failed, and whether that provider lets you resubmit.
| Provider | Code | Resubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Twiliogen1 | 30886 | Yes |
Rules you will hit next
Other policy pages rules at the same severity. A registration is judged as a whole, not rule by rule.
POL-204 is one of 157 policy pages rules in the 915-rule 10DLC registry. Free to cite under CC BY 4.0.